|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]()
![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() "I dislike Allegory, the conscious and intentional allegory," J.R.R. Tolkien wrote in an oft-quoted 1951 letter. What media pundits never do is let the British author finish his thought: "Yet any attempt to explain the purport of myth or fairy tale must use allegorical language" (The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien, Letter #145). ![]() All this makes for stimulating thought, but where would Tolkien have readers of his epic fiction look for types? Another selection from his "Letters" holds the answer. "The Lord of the Rings is of course a fundamentally religious and Catholic work... [wherein] the religious element is absorbed into the story and its symbolism" (Tolkien, Letter #172). ![]() Tolkien used vivid language to describe this place, and Peter Jackson did a phenomenal job visualizing Fangorn on the big screen. But why the mystery surrounding a bunch of old, run-down trees? I believe it's because Tolkien hid some startling truths among the towering greenery, observations about the worldwide Body of Christ. ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Articles written by the staff. Maintained by WebMaster Dan Ficker. Site Design by da Man All Material © 1999-2005 Different Media LLC Support cMusicWeb.com |